Not bad at all for CPU. Pathetic compared to high level GPUs.
That 16 -17k isn't bad at all for a cpu running SMP.
All but one of my CPUs (various gens of core i7) run on 6 threads for SMP, one for the GPU and one spare. The first gen i7 6 threads at 3.75GHz gets only 14k approx.
An Ivy on 6 threads gets more of course. Anything from 16k to 22k, and that's at 4.5GHz.
It seems 8 to 10 threads is the magic number. I have a first gen i7990x, (cost $1,000 and they still go for about the same - crazy!) ave ppd with that one is over, well over 30k ppd. It was the worlds fastest CPU for quite a while though.
Anyway, I'm rambling. What I want to say is that seeing as the i7 990x has 12 threads (six cores) I run it with 5 cores (10 threads) at 4.35GHz. That little mama has been pulling in around 28k to 40k for about 4 years now! (Average ppd is well over 30k with i7 990x on 10 threads) Damm, just repeated myself. Pah!
BUT: For the past 2, maybe 3 years CPU folding gets such low ppd compared to GPU that it's debatable if it''s even worth it if your machine contains a good GPU.
I mean a 970 can get up to 300k when lucky and a wee OC. My now functioning boostless modded 780ti which runs fine up to 1,188MHz core at 1.2v pulls in 240k.
Tested for 52 hours. I run it at 1.1GHz 1.87v. Dedicated folder, gets a steady 190 to 210k ppd at that setting. Never crashes.
So, that 780ti is paired with 1st gen i7 960 at 3.75GHz 6 threads and is currently getting 13k ppd. Rather pathetic when compared to the massive ppd that top (or even middle tear) GPU can get. In fact on that machine, the GPU earns about 92% or 93% or the ppd. The darn CPU earns the other 7 or 8%. Sheesh!!
That 16 -17k isn't bad at all for a cpu running SMP.
All but one of my CPUs (various gens of core i7) run on 6 threads for SMP, one for the GPU and one spare. The first gen i7 6 threads at 3.75GHz gets only 14k approx.
An Ivy on 6 threads gets more of course. Anything from 16k to 22k, and that's at 4.5GHz.
It seems 8 to 10 threads is the magic number. I have a first gen i7990x, (cost $1,000 and they still go for about the same - crazy!) ave ppd with that one is over, well over 30k ppd. It was the worlds fastest CPU for quite a while though.
Anyway, I'm rambling. What I want to say is that seeing as the i7 990x has 12 threads (six cores) I run it with 5 cores (10 threads) at 4.35GHz. That little mama has been pulling in around 28k to 40k for about 4 years now! (Average ppd is well over 30k with i7 990x on 10 threads) Damm, just repeated myself. Pah!

BUT: For the past 2, maybe 3 years CPU folding gets such low ppd compared to GPU that it's debatable if it''s even worth it if your machine contains a good GPU.
I mean a 970 can get up to 300k when lucky and a wee OC. My now functioning boostless modded 780ti which runs fine up to 1,188MHz core at 1.2v pulls in 240k.
Tested for 52 hours. I run it at 1.1GHz 1.87v. Dedicated folder, gets a steady 190 to 210k ppd at that setting. Never crashes.
So, that 780ti is paired with 1st gen i7 960 at 3.75GHz 6 threads and is currently getting 13k ppd. Rather pathetic when compared to the massive ppd that top (or even middle tear) GPU can get. In fact on that machine, the GPU earns about 92% or 93% or the ppd. The darn CPU earns the other 7 or 8%. Sheesh!!
Comment